As you can tell by the title I’m gonna be talking about the results of the voting yesterday. Now before I begin I realize that this is a touchy topic. But I’ll just be saying what I think of the results. And if we disagree we can still be friends with different views. It is very difficult to find two people who agree on every political issue. Also before I begin I must confess that I did not vote yesterday! Mainly because I’m only seventeen!:) But none of my family voted either! Why you ask? Well in our area the only voting there was to do was for two city council members. And guess how many candidates were on the ballot? Two. And guess what they both were elected!:) The beauty of living in Small Town, USA.:)
First off the big headline news was that the races for governor in Virginia and New Jersey were both won by Republicans. And neither of the new governors are merely a RINO (Republican In Name Only). Both have very strong political platforms that are plainly conservative. In Virginia the Republican defeated the Democrat by over 15%! And this was the state that many said was turning blue. I lived in Virginia for a number of years so this race was of particular interest to me. I see two things from this race and also the one in New Jersey. Number One: Conservatism is NOT dead! The Era of Reagan is NOT over! There are still those in the country who want biblical values in government. They still hold to the right to Life for the unborn, the elderly, and the handicapped. They hold to the right of Liberty to worship how they wish, to think what they wish, and to say what they wish. The very fact that I am able to write this blog post is because in our country we have Freedom of the Press! If I was living in a Communist country I would be in fear of my life for writing this! “My Country Tis' of Thee, Sweet Land of Liberty”.
But Number Two: The Conservatives were not the only Voters! By that I mean that it is not just Republicans that are dissatisfied with the way our country is going. Now I have nothing against President Obama as a person. I believe he is a fine man and as our president deserves respect. I do not however agree with his policies on abortion, health care, the economy, and many other issues. And based on the voting yesterday it is obvious that I am not alone.
I found it interesting that about two years ago, as I was seeking to earn credit for college through CLEP testing, I took the exam on public speaking. The exam consists of a written segment and also a speaking section. The topic for the speaking part is randomly chosen and you are then given a certain amount of time to prepare and then deliver a two minute speech. I was given a topic and it was on “Whether or not the Government should subsidize health care”. At the time that was not as major an issue as it is now. However I still knew enough about the subject to prepare and deliver the speech. Unfortunately only one record was made of the speech so I don’t have a copy of it. I think it would be interesting to listen to the reasons I gave back then. Anyway just a paragraph long side note.:)
The 23rd district in New York was also in the headlines a lot especially in the week leading up to voting. I find the same true of this election as the two races for Governor. But, someone will say, the Conservative lost! I realize that, but Hoffman lost by only 5%! And he was not even on the Republican ticket! The Republican who dropped out was still on the ballot as the Republican running. And she got 5% of the vote! Yes Hoffman lost but if he had been on the Republican ballot in the first place he surely would have won. But the Republican was not chosen in a primary election. If they had held a primary then she would never had made it to the final election. Hoffman would have been chosen not her. This just goes to show why we have the system that we do.
Not before you begin to think that I plan to comment on every race, don’t worry. I only have two issues that were voted on to discuss and then I’ll be through.
First off in Maine the issue of legalizing gay marriage was brought to the people for a vote. The legislature passed a law allowing gay marriage but a petition with enough names was made up so the issue went to the people for a vote. And the people said “NO!”. I heard today that no state has ever legalized gay marriage by a vote of the people. Unfountunatly in some states, my current home state of Iowa included, the legislature has passed the law that legalizes it. But I thought this was government by the people! Why must a petition be made up to reconsider an issue after the legislature has decided on it? Why not go to the people in the first place? I realize that this is unpractical for all issues. That is the purpose of elections. But if it is known that their people do not support an issue then why pass it without their consent? I recently watched the film “Amazing Grace”. William Wilberforce encountered this same problem. Members of Parliament did not care what the people desired. They merely cared about what would benefit them. This is not the duty of our elected officials. They have been referred to as public servants and that is exactly what they should be. Their foremost thought should be “How will this benefit or best represent the people who elected me?”.
Finally in Texas the subject of Emminent Domain was brought to the people for a vote. And they voted it down. Now for those of you who do not know what that is let me try to summarize it in a nutshell. Emminent Domain says that the government (whether city, state, or national) is able to take private property for public use with fair reimbursement. I mentioned this issue on my Facebook and a friend of mine pointed out that Emminent Domain is in the Constitution! I was surprised somewhat to hear this. If it is in the Constitution are citizens of a state able to decide whether to accept the Constitution? So decided to look into it. I didn’t find it in the Constitution itself but in the Bill of Rights(first ten amendments). Hmm? Funny place to find it… Anyway here is the first statement I found: Article IV
“The right of people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated…”
After listing several rights of the people in Article V (also known as the fifth amendment) I then found this statement:
“…nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation”
So what do we read here? Private property cannot be taken for public use without a just(or fair) compensation. So was there anything wrong with the Texans voting to make this illegal in Texas? I would no there was nothing wrong with that. Texans were not voting on whether or not they should obey the Constitution! The Constitution does not say that the government has the right to seize personal property! Instead it says that if it is seized then the owner should receive a fair price for their property. If the citizens of Texas do not want to give their state government that capability then that’s their decision. Now why this issue is of interest to me is that we lived in Texas for about six years. While we were there we lived about half a mile from Highway 37 in San Antonio. One year we heard of a new project called the Trans Texas Corridor. It was basically a super highway going from the southern border to the northern border of Texas. And it was planned to pass straight by our property. But with the clearance they needed it would possibly include our property! So we faced the possibility of losing our home. Of course we would expect to get a fair compensation. But that would merely be for what the property was valued at. It would not help us any with the disruption of having to move somewhere else. Now a friend of ours in Texas encountered this issue with a rental property that he owned. The city needed the property for a school expansion. But in his case he felt that the amount he was given was more than enough. But on the other hand I heard of instances where people felt they were given far below the value of their property. Even worse than an individual losing their property is when a business is forced to move. Some of you may have heard of the ministry Vision Forum. My brother-in-law actually worked there while they lived in Texas. Soon after he left we heard that the city had told Vision Forum that they were going to practice Emminent Domain with their building because the city needed it for a fire station. For them it would have been a major loss no matter what they were given for the building. They had been there for a number of years so to move meant changing their address and also finding a new place to set up in. Part of their ministry is a store that sells items both through a storefront but also through mail order and the internet. Thankfully nothing ever came of it. But I want each of you to think of how it must have felt. Imagine hearing that very soon you might lose you home and have to move for no other reason than that a school nearby needs an extra playground! So I say “Go Texas!”. We need more states to follow your example.